He’s a moderator, and part of his role is to police the threads to ensure they dont get cluttered with issues or questions that are perhaps better addressed on other forums. Whilst we are all willing to discuss the various issues around achieving good and sustainable range using LoRa/LoRaWAN and whilst you will find lots of discussion around, configurations, placement, antenna and cable types, optimisations etc. on the forum (Forum serach is your friend 
) we are also very clear that is in connection with TTN (TTI fund the forum infrastrtucture to the benefit of the TTN community) and in association with correct use of LoRaWAN (we are not here to support proprietary LoRa or LoRa P2P using specific frequency choices etc.) - there are plenty of other maker or industry fora that can be used for such off topic discussions and questions, including e.g. Semtech’s own forum. (Note you have the attention of some experienced forumites with people like Stuart @LoRaTracker and Nick @descartes well versed in e.g. long range HAB LoRa/LoRaWAN deployment use cases and also reguar poster @jezd responding to you).
Your posts indicate you are using a fixed frequency vs all random channels allowed under LoRaWAN, this forum focus was called out by @jezd, @descartes then re-enforced. Note all users posting history is available through profile pages so if you find a poster whom you trust and feel gives valuable information or guidance then it can be a useful exercise to look back at what they have had to say on various topics (e.g. @LoRaTracker who also has experience with LoRa P2P from early days with the technology, and who has done lots of field work wrt range testing), similarly if we see users asking questions that are out of scope or off topic then again we can call this out. If users regularly abuse (might be a strong term but not yet had enough coffee this morning to think of a more subtle term) or mis-appropriate the forum resource to repeatedly ask off topic questions or push own agenda’s then we can call this out or take stronger measures for persistent cases. And yes, by the nature of the role Mods like Nick are more likley to go digging into history - quite often this can be to understand wider issues and concerns a user may have and better help them but also this can bring up off topic posts or prior guidance give to posters. Nick had done that on prior post as he points out.
Ironically though not focussed on TTN your close out on that thread was an example of what could could be considered good forum behaviour - with questions asked and discussed and finally providing some feedback with a fix (in that case surpressing device power consumption) that may benefit others Adafruit M0 Feather with RFM95 - Expected Power Consumption - #6 by tjh1989uk , so please consider what we have said and avoid such challenging/confrontational behaviour. Clearly you can be a valued forumite if you play the ball vs play the man.
By the way we are all curious - where are you? is the (uk) a clue or not (your IP address didnt immediately resolve - Host1Plus? via BT? London?)