We’re seemingly about 18m away (2021-07-01) from having a new band (928-935) available, low-power and duty cycle but also presumably a lot less noise. Word doc here, see Appendix B
That band would be pretty unconflicted and provide yet more choice in the .AU marketplace. It’d also fracture coverage further, if TTN supports it, but I’d be interested in thoughts on that. We’re already fairly well off in Australia so perhaps it’d be better to leave it to other IoT networks?
Table 3 of the Doc refers to the use of “Low power/duty-cycle fixed links/mesh nodes”. I would interpret that to mean that LoraWan (being a Point to Multi-point system) does not meet this requirement. Lora point-to-point links and a series of Lora nodes that work in a mesh network would comply. Then they need to comply with the power and duty cycle requirements.
Yep I agree with @TonySmith I don’t think it effects anything in the lorawan world. If only the mobile operators would allow us on to the same frequencies as Europe and get a standard happening.
There is an ETSI proposal to use 915 in Europe. No idea what’s required to clear this band but from memory the timing was the next year or two.
Its not to create a common global band but to increase capacity in Europe.
I agree the wording makes it sound more like they want ZigBee mesh kinds of things. Getting the smart meters into another band would still be a net positive for other users like us though.