There are many comments and articles all over the internet about Network Server in Lorawan. Yes, I understand why it should be. But Iâm really curious and have trouble understanding this. So what happens if I donât connect to Lorawan Network Server? So what if I only wanted to access my applications(like an HTTP server, MQTT Clients e.g.) with end-nodes and Lorawan gateways? Could you please give an example on the subject through 1-2 different scenarios?
And in addition, please be non-judgmental in your comments. I can try to explain more if my question isnât clear, but exactly what I wanted to ask is the question I wanted to ask you above. Please, please donât steer the subject in a different direction by saying that âyou read these specifications first or you donât understand this, etc.â. Thanks in advance for your understanding and valuable comments.
This sounds suspiciously like you have been asked a question for a college course and need an answer. Can you explain why you need us to answer this question?
As a strict follower, I must say that you are a good detective, but this time you did not catch me (: No, I am not trying to find the answer to the question for an exam, lecture, or college. I have friends who manufacture industrial IoT devices using different wireless technologies over Gateways and Routers. These guys are dealing with traditional wireless communication systems and data transfers. And so they want to use Lorawan technology to the same standards. I could not explain them to why Network Stack is needed in LoraWan technology. They think LNS is a burden and restrictions on the network in free usage are a big problem. They claim that they want to remove LNS and directly access the Applications or a database with Gateway devices. They believe that they can solve it faster by acting as an aggregator and a bridge with the Internet, without dealing with the Server. Maybe they are right, I donât know. My only purpose was to provide them with scenarios with plausible and solid evidence for using the LNS.
If they want to deviate from LoRaWAN by creating their own protocol using Lora they are free to do so. For LoRaWAN you need the network server is that is what makes it a network (as in what a telco provides).
For commercial parties that require advice/consulting Iâm no longer providing it for free. May-be one of the other volunteers is willing to spend their valuable time.
He rather lost me at "please be non-judgmental in your comments ⌠Please, please donât steer the subject in a different direction by saying that âyou read these specifications first or you donât understand this, etc.ââ.
Not wording I find in âHow to win friends & influence peopleâ.
If someone has an apparent knowledge gap that can only be resolved by learning, it is not judgemental to say that you donât understand and you need to read more, itâs a fact, but as I learnt LoRaWAN by reading & doing and answering questions here for a fair amount of time, itâs easy to spot.
What you want is us to write the answer to your âfriendsâ question because you were unable to explain how LoRaWAN works (which is almost all about the Network Server)? Which implies a knowledge gap. Or you want to create a solution that doesnât required a NS and want someone to tell you how? Or you want to tell your âfriendsâ how to do it - which if you canât explain to them why the NS is important can never go well when they start using LoRaWAN devices without an NS.
It appears to me that you actually wanted to know how to ditch the NS, not why the NS is pivotal to the LoRaWAN scheme. Given your âstrategicâ approach to eliciting free consultancy, hopefully you will keep enquiries on topic for this forum which is LoRaWAN on TTS CE / TTN.
The Network Server can be thought of as the heart of a LoRaWAN networkâŚcut out the heart and you donât have a network! Sounds like you and your âfriendsâ need to understand the typical architecture and key elements and components of LoRaWAN networksâŚâŚ 60 minutes watching Everything you need to know about LoRaWAN in 60 minutes - Johan Stokking (The Things Industries) - YouTube would not be a waste of your and your âfriendsâ time I feelâŚ.